Article by: Kenneth J. Ester
Unbelievable Science
Why do so many scientists stand so strongly against believing in God? Scientists who don't believe in God will say because there is no evidence that God is real. The idea that God exists is too unbelievable for them to accept without proof.
Interesting.
Science bases itself on proof and repeat-ability. It stands against believing in things it cannot prove or has no evidence to back up.... or does not fits its agenda. Yes I said that scary word that makes so many eyes roll upwards. Agenda.
There is zero evidence that anything can ever come from nothing. Science will tell you straight out that is impossible. But it will tell you that the universe started from nothing. Science believes the universe had a beginning but what created that first singularity, science has no idea. Ask them where that singularity came from and they have no answer. But it couldn't be from God because God doesn't exist. So its easier to believe it just happened. Some scientists will drum up new theories about multiple universes, as if those universes don't also need a beginning, but it just can't be a spiritual all powerful deity, because that is too hard to believe.
Science believes the first life form came from non-living substances. Though the odds of that happening by their own belief is so unbelievably impossible that it would take a hundred trillion years to duplicate it in a laboratory. But they will believe that is what happened before believing in God.
Interesting.
Science bases itself on proof and repeat-ability. It stands against believing in things it cannot prove or has no evidence to back up.... or does not fits its agenda. Yes I said that scary word that makes so many eyes roll upwards. Agenda.
There is zero evidence that anything can ever come from nothing. Science will tell you straight out that is impossible. But it will tell you that the universe started from nothing. Science believes the universe had a beginning but what created that first singularity, science has no idea. Ask them where that singularity came from and they have no answer. But it couldn't be from God because God doesn't exist. So its easier to believe it just happened. Some scientists will drum up new theories about multiple universes, as if those universes don't also need a beginning, but it just can't be a spiritual all powerful deity, because that is too hard to believe.
Science believes the first life form came from non-living substances. Though the odds of that happening by their own belief is so unbelievably impossible that it would take a hundred trillion years to duplicate it in a laboratory. But they will believe that is what happened before believing in God.
Scientists believe that the first intelligent life form came by accident, spawned from non-intelligent substances. They can never repeat this happening again in a lab because it is impossible, but they will believe this happened by accident rather than believe in God.
Something coming from nothing. Science says it is impossible and has never seen evidence of it actually happening.
Life coming from non-life. Science has never seen it happen and has zero evidence backing this theory up.
Intelligence coming from non-intelligence. Again, science has never seen it happen and has zero evidence backing it up.
Yet scientists will state that all three of these things actually happened. All three scenarios have absolutely zero evidence backing the theories up, but all three are accepted by scientists.
Since the beginning of time people have believed in God. Before there were any telescopes to look into space there was the belief in God. Before there was even a theory of the Big Bang and the universe having an actual beginning, there was the belief that God had created the universe. Before there was a belief that the first life formed by accident, the Bible was saying God created man. Before any philosopher recognized that "thought" was the proof of existence, the Bible said God made man in His image and gave him free will.
Scientists would have you believe that people try to replace real science with God, but in truth it is the other way around. For thousands of years man has believed that God made the universe and God created man and woman, and God gave us intelligence. But because scientists did not want to believe in God, they are the ones who came up with new theories to counter God. They decided to believe the universe was static and had no beginning. Then the more proof that has come out that the Big Bang theory was real, and science has had to believe the Universe does have a beginning, which lines up with God creating it, they have had to come up with multiple universe theories among others. All easily put down. Because it did not want to believe in God, they came up with the idea that life came about by accident as specific chemicals and nutrients came together by accident. Rather than believe in God they chose to come up with the theory that non-intelligent goop learned to think. All theories that science has zero evidence of. All fantasies that science has drummed up for no other reason than to not believe in God. All ideas that even if you want to really stretch your imagination to its limit and believe they could happen, the odds of all three happening are enough to say there is no way they happened.
Something coming from nothing? Science says is impossible, yet cant explain where the first singularity came from when the Big Bang happened.
Life coming from non-living elements? Science says the odds of that happening are unbelievably slim to the point it may as well be considered impossible. There are better odds of thirty thousand blind men in a stadium, all solving the Rubik's Cube at the exact same time. Yet Science accepts that as what happened.
Intelligent life coming from a life form with no intelligence or self awareness? Science cannot repeat it. The odds of it happening are about the same as life coming from non-living substances. Science cannot repeat it. Yet science says that's what happened.
Rather than believe in a God that the world has accepted as real since the beginning of mankind, they drum up other fantasies that are even more far fetched and unbelievable and try to push them across as science. For a group that says they wont believe anything that cant be proven, they tend to believe quite a bit that has no evidence, much less proof.
God is believed in by the vast majority of mankind in all lands. He has always been a part of the world beliefs. There are millions who believe they have experienced God's presence. Not a few hundred, but millions over the centuries. The New Testament if you learn about it, gives so much reason to accept it as accurate. People who have experienced God have been willing to die for their beliefs. There are so many miracle healings that are documented by doctors and millions upon millions through time who have seen their prayers answered. The stories of God creating the universe and creating man came before science was even aware the universe had a beginning or thought of the idea of evolution.
Is this proof of God's existence? No. But overall, there is far more evidence and logical reason to believe in God, than to believe in the fantasies scientists have contrived and pushes at us as science just because it doesn't want to believe in God. Yet they say they don't believe in God because there is not enough proof and the idea is too unbelievable.
Yeah, .... Okay....!
Return to Evidence of God Articles
Return to One God Logic Articles
Something coming from nothing. Science says it is impossible and has never seen evidence of it actually happening.
Life coming from non-life. Science has never seen it happen and has zero evidence backing this theory up.
Intelligence coming from non-intelligence. Again, science has never seen it happen and has zero evidence backing it up.
Yet scientists will state that all three of these things actually happened. All three scenarios have absolutely zero evidence backing the theories up, but all three are accepted by scientists.
Since the beginning of time people have believed in God. Before there were any telescopes to look into space there was the belief in God. Before there was even a theory of the Big Bang and the universe having an actual beginning, there was the belief that God had created the universe. Before there was a belief that the first life formed by accident, the Bible was saying God created man. Before any philosopher recognized that "thought" was the proof of existence, the Bible said God made man in His image and gave him free will.
Scientists would have you believe that people try to replace real science with God, but in truth it is the other way around. For thousands of years man has believed that God made the universe and God created man and woman, and God gave us intelligence. But because scientists did not want to believe in God, they are the ones who came up with new theories to counter God. They decided to believe the universe was static and had no beginning. Then the more proof that has come out that the Big Bang theory was real, and science has had to believe the Universe does have a beginning, which lines up with God creating it, they have had to come up with multiple universe theories among others. All easily put down. Because it did not want to believe in God, they came up with the idea that life came about by accident as specific chemicals and nutrients came together by accident. Rather than believe in God they chose to come up with the theory that non-intelligent goop learned to think. All theories that science has zero evidence of. All fantasies that science has drummed up for no other reason than to not believe in God. All ideas that even if you want to really stretch your imagination to its limit and believe they could happen, the odds of all three happening are enough to say there is no way they happened.
Something coming from nothing? Science says is impossible, yet cant explain where the first singularity came from when the Big Bang happened.
Life coming from non-living elements? Science says the odds of that happening are unbelievably slim to the point it may as well be considered impossible. There are better odds of thirty thousand blind men in a stadium, all solving the Rubik's Cube at the exact same time. Yet Science accepts that as what happened.
Intelligent life coming from a life form with no intelligence or self awareness? Science cannot repeat it. The odds of it happening are about the same as life coming from non-living substances. Science cannot repeat it. Yet science says that's what happened.
Rather than believe in a God that the world has accepted as real since the beginning of mankind, they drum up other fantasies that are even more far fetched and unbelievable and try to push them across as science. For a group that says they wont believe anything that cant be proven, they tend to believe quite a bit that has no evidence, much less proof.
God is believed in by the vast majority of mankind in all lands. He has always been a part of the world beliefs. There are millions who believe they have experienced God's presence. Not a few hundred, but millions over the centuries. The New Testament if you learn about it, gives so much reason to accept it as accurate. People who have experienced God have been willing to die for their beliefs. There are so many miracle healings that are documented by doctors and millions upon millions through time who have seen their prayers answered. The stories of God creating the universe and creating man came before science was even aware the universe had a beginning or thought of the idea of evolution.
Is this proof of God's existence? No. But overall, there is far more evidence and logical reason to believe in God, than to believe in the fantasies scientists have contrived and pushes at us as science just because it doesn't want to believe in God. Yet they say they don't believe in God because there is not enough proof and the idea is too unbelievable.
Yeah, .... Okay....!
Return to Evidence of God Articles
Return to One God Logic Articles
