Article by: Kenneth J. Ester
Self Awareness
I think, therefore I am!
The meaning to this famous saying is simple to figure out. For one to have thought, to be able to think, one must first exist. But where did the ability to think come from?
First science would tell us that the universe had been created from nothing. Something from nothing. Which is already accepted as completely impossible by science.
Then it would tell you the first life form came about by accident when just the perfect elements came together to create the first life form. Though science will admit that it cannot repeat it, it has never witnessed it happening, and the only time it has ever happened was when life first formed on Earth.
Now against all odds, for a third time something happens only once and never happens again. An unintelligent life form spawns a life form that has the ability to think and have self awareness. In a sense, it is saying a glob of goop developed into a creature that had the ability to think and reason. Can science repeat this incredible instance? Nope! Has it ever witnessed it happening even once? Nope. Yet it will assure you this is what happened. And it expects you to accept this as a reasonable explanation for where intelligent life came from.
The reason science will play this game of double standards is because it knows these things are impossible. It knows intelligent life cannot come from unintelligent life. But the only plausible answer for where it came from would be God. Since science believes Gd is impossible, it chooses to believe in something else that is impossible instead. With all the evidence of the possibility that God is real that is out there, science refuses to accept it is possible and instead chooses to accept a theory that not only do they know it is impossible, they don't have any evidence whatsoever to believe it can be possible.
Science refuses to accept that God is possible simply because God cannot be proven to them, but will turn around and accept something else that is impossible as what happened, even though they cannot prove that theory either. Does that make sense to you?
Return to Evidence of God Articles
Return to One God Logic Articles
The meaning to this famous saying is simple to figure out. For one to have thought, to be able to think, one must first exist. But where did the ability to think come from?
First science would tell us that the universe had been created from nothing. Something from nothing. Which is already accepted as completely impossible by science.
Then it would tell you the first life form came about by accident when just the perfect elements came together to create the first life form. Though science will admit that it cannot repeat it, it has never witnessed it happening, and the only time it has ever happened was when life first formed on Earth.
Now against all odds, for a third time something happens only once and never happens again. An unintelligent life form spawns a life form that has the ability to think and have self awareness. In a sense, it is saying a glob of goop developed into a creature that had the ability to think and reason. Can science repeat this incredible instance? Nope! Has it ever witnessed it happening even once? Nope. Yet it will assure you this is what happened. And it expects you to accept this as a reasonable explanation for where intelligent life came from.
The reason science will play this game of double standards is because it knows these things are impossible. It knows intelligent life cannot come from unintelligent life. But the only plausible answer for where it came from would be God. Since science believes Gd is impossible, it chooses to believe in something else that is impossible instead. With all the evidence of the possibility that God is real that is out there, science refuses to accept it is possible and instead chooses to accept a theory that not only do they know it is impossible, they don't have any evidence whatsoever to believe it can be possible.
Science refuses to accept that God is possible simply because God cannot be proven to them, but will turn around and accept something else that is impossible as what happened, even though they cannot prove that theory either. Does that make sense to you?
Return to Evidence of God Articles
Return to One God Logic Articles
